Innodb File iblogfile101 aio Write Returned Os Error 187 Cannot Continue Operation
[Solved] MySql InnoDB crash recovery - File ./ibdata1: 'open' returned OS error 71. Cannot continue operation
- Thread starter Matt
- Start date
- #1
Matt Asks: MySql InnoDB crash recovery - File ./ibdata1: 'open' returned OS error 71. Cannot continue operation
Mysql 8.0.23 on CentOS 7.9 with WHM
I ended up with a corrupted InnoDB table. I gave up on a long query and killed it. Then the query was still blocking so I did a forceful server reboot. I know now that the query was still blocking because it was undoing the process. Killing it with a forceful server reboot corrupted my database. The rest is history.
So I've been trying to work through this process: https://dev.iserversupport.com/recover-crashed-innodb-tables-on-mysql-database-server/
But it seems MySQL doesn't want to recreate the ibdata1 file.
my.cnf:
Code:
# For advice on how to change settings please see # http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.0/en/server-configuration-defaults.html [mysqld] disable-log-bin=1 default-authentication-plugin=mysql_native_password performance-schema=0 # # Remove leading # and set to the amount of RAM for the most important data # cache in MySQL. Start at 70% of total RAM for dedicated server, else 10%. # innodb_buffer_pool_size = 128M # # Remove the leading "# " to disable binary logging # Binary logging captures changes between backups and is enabled by # default. It's default setting is log_bin=binlog # disable_log_bin # # Remove leading # to set options mainly useful for reporting servers. # The server defaults are faster for transactions and fast SELECTs. # Adjust sizes as needed, experiment to find the optimal values. # join_buffer_size = 128M # sort_buffer_size = 2M # read_rnd_buffer_size = 2M # # Remove leading # to revert to previous value for default_authentication_plugin, # this will increase compatibility with older clients. For background, see: # https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.0/en/server-system-variables.html#sysvar_default_authentication_plugin # default-authentication-plugin=mysql_native_password datadir=/var/lib/mysql socket=/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock log-error=/var/log/mysqld.log pid-file=/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.pid innodb_file_per_table=1 default-storage-engine=MyISAM interactive_timeout=300 key_cache_block_size=4096 max_heap_table_size=5G max_join_size=1000000000 max_allowed_packet=268435456 open_files_limit=40000 thread_cache_size=100 tmp_table_size=5G wait_timeout=7800 max_user_connections=500 myisam_recover_options=FORCE innodb_file_per_table=1 innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit=0 innodb_purge_threads=1 innodb_thread_concurrency=8 pid-file=/var/lib/mysql/mysqld.pid performance-schema=0 sql_mode='' interactive_timeout=30 wait_timeout=90 collation-server = utf8_unicode_ci character-set-server=utf8 key_buffer_size = 4G innodb_buffer_pool_size = 8G innodb_buffer_pool_chunk_size = 256M innodb_buffer_pool_instances = 8 max_connections=300 And error log:
Code:
2021-01-19T18:18:18.543601Z 1 [ERROR] [MY-012592] [InnoDB] Operating system error number 2 in a file operation. 2021-01-19T18:18:18.543714Z 1 [ERROR] [MY-012593] [InnoDB] The error means the system cannot find the path specified. 2021-01-19T18:18:18.543792Z 1 [ERROR] [MY-012594] [InnoDB] If you are installing InnoDB, remember that you must create directories yourself, InnoDB does not create them. 2021-01-19T18:18:18.543895Z 1 [ERROR] [MY-012646] [InnoDB] File ./ibdata1: 'open' returned OS error 71. Cannot continue operation 2021-01-19T18:18:18.543986Z 1 [ERROR] [MY-012981] [InnoDB] Cannot continue operation. 2021-01-19T18:18:19.908326Z 0 [System] [MY-010116] [Server] /usr/sbin/mysqld (mysqld 8.0.23) starting as process 1777 2021-01-19T18:18:19.909547Z 0 [Warning] [MY-013242] [Server] --character-set-server: 'utf8' is currently an alias for the character set UTF8MB3, but will be an alias for UTF8MB4 in a future release. Please consider using UTF8MB4 in order to be unambiguous. 2021-01-19T18:18:19.909570Z 0 [Warning] [MY-013244] [Server] --collation-server: 'utf8_unicode_ci' is a collation of the deprecated character set UTF8MB3. Please consider using UTF8MB4 with an appropriate collation instead. 2021-01-19T18:18:19.959205Z 1 [System] [MY-013576] [InnoDB] InnoDB initialization has started. This makes me think I have an ownership or read/write permissions error. But I checked the ownership on the /var/lib/mysql directory and it is mysql:mysql, permission is 751.
I was able to recover all of my data by forcing innodb_force_recovery = 3. But now that I've deleted those ibd files I can't get the server to start again either way. I did back them up, and I've tried copying them back but no dice.
I also attempted to re-install mysql via WHM. That failed.
Thank you Matt
- uno
- Mathematics
- Replies: 0
uno Asks: On image of map $\text{Ext}^1_R(X,F)\to \text{Ext}^1_R(X,G)$ induced by $R$-linear map of free modules $F\to G$ with entries in the maximal ideal
Let $(R,\mathfrak m)$ be a Noetherian local ring. Let $F,G$ be finitely generated free $R$-modules and $f:F\to G$ be an $R$-linear map such that $f(F)\subseteq \mathfrak m G$. Let $X$ be a finitely generated $R$-module, and let $\alpha : 0\to F \to A_{\alpha} \to X \to 0$ be a short exact sequence i.e. $[\alpha]\in \text{Ext}^1_R(X,F)$. We have a following push-out diagram with $[\beta] \in \text{Ext}^1_R(X,G)$.
My question is: must it be necessarily true that $[\beta] \in \mathfrak m \text{Ext}^1_R(X,G)$?
Some Thoughts: The answer is affirmative if $F\cong G\cong R$. Indeed, in this case, $f:R\to R$ must be given by multiplication by some $x\in R$. Since $f(F)\subseteq \mathfrak m G$, so $x\in \mathfrak m$. Then in $[\beta]=x[\alpha]\in \text{Ext}^1_R(X,R)$, hence $[\beta]\in x\text{Ext}^1_R(X,R)\subseteq \mathfrak m \text{Ext}^1_R(X,G) $.
- Abhishek Parab
- Mathematics
- Replies: 0
Abhishek Parab Asks: Example of unramified abelian extension
In his notes in Algebraic Number theory, J S Milne gives the following as an example of an unramified Abelian extension :
$ K = \mathbb Q (\sqrt{-5})$ having a quadratic extension $L = \mathbb Q (\sqrt{-1}, \sqrt{-5})$. Then, $L/K$ has discriminant a unit, so it ramifies.
My question is, considering the simple extension $L = K(i)$ gives the discriminant to be $-4$, which clearly isn't a unit in $\mathcal O_K$. Am I committing any mistake?
Can you suggest other examples of unramified extensions?
Since I am a beginner in Class Field theory, related examples (of Abelian / non-Abelian extensions), counter-examples and other insights are more than welcome.
- CTuser_103
- Mathematics
- Replies: 0
CTuser_103 Asks: Solve $f(x)+f(1+\frac{1}{x})=1+x$
The title means
This question is made by my friend. He does not restrict the function with any condition, though adding some condition may be necessary. In addition, I found some similar questions, e.g. $f(x)+f(1-\frac1x)=1+x$. For this example, I could replace $x$ by $1-\frac1x$ and $1\frac1{1-x}$, then just solving the system of linear equation. Unfortunately, these operations can't be used for present quesion.
Any insights on this question would be greatly appreciated.
- Justin
- Mathematics
- Replies: 0
Justin Asks: Prove that the real vector space consisting of all continuous, real-valued functions on the interval [0,1] is infinite-dimensional.
A follow up to this question. I kinda understand that the vector space of polynomials (P(R)) is a subspace to the infinite set of numbers between the interval [0,1]. Is this because we can represent an arbitrary number within the interval with polynomial of any degree? Something I am missing here.
- CapnShanty
- Mathematics
- Replies: 0
CapnShanty Asks: How to determine if two vehicles will be in the same place during movement?
I have what I hope is an interesting problem. Maybe I'm just conceptualizing it poorly in my head.
I have two ships moving on a track in discrete increments (so, spaces on a board), each ship having three properties: direction (clockwise or counter-clockwise, denoted by 1 and -1), speed (positive integer), and grid point (0-160, which wraps around but that's irrelevant here). I need to determine whether the first ship, S1, will catch S2 the next time they both move.
Simple enough usually. However, here's the tricky bit. The way these ships move is that at each possible speed, so say from 50 to 0, all ships with 50 speed move 1 and have their speed reduced by 1, to 49. Then all ships with 49 speed (including those that had 50 changed to 49) move 1 place in their direction, and their speeds all become 48 and so on and so forth.
In other words, it's not like they magically teleport their speed*direction ahead, or 1 moves at a time; multiple can move at the same time, but also a faster ship can arrive where a slower one is before they've even started moving.
What I need to determine, is if at any point S1 and S2 will be on the same grid point during the movement process. I feel like there must be an elegant mathematical answer that doesn't involve the naive solution of just simulating the movement and seeing if it happens.
Hopefully I've explained that well enough? My current attempts don't particularly work, because I'm struggling to take into account the 1-by-1 multiple ship movement. Like, if S2 is 13 spaces ahead of S1 with a speed of 5, and S1's speed is 15... S1 won't catch S2.
- Help Stochastic
- Mathematics
- Replies: 0
Help Stochastic Asks: Stochastic differential equation of Ito's process
I need to find the SDE of:
sin(Wt) where Wt is Brownian Motion
- Antonio Maria Di Mauro
- Mathematics
- Replies: 0
Antonio Maria Di Mauro Asks: If $X$ is embeddable into a closed set of a complete metric space $M$ then is $X$ complete?
So let be $(M,d)$ a complete metric space and thus we suppose that $X$ is a topological space which is embeddable via a homeomorphism $f$ into set $Y$ of $M$ so that it is surely metrizable because $Y$ is metrizable with respect the subspace topology through a simple restriction of the metric $d$ on $M$. Now I know that completeness generally is neither a topological property and neither a hereditable property: however I know that $Y$ is complete whether it is closed whereas and in this case $X$ would be complete whether $f$ was a isometry but I was not able to find a counterexample where $Y$ is closed and $f$ is not an isometry whereas $X$ is not complete so that I thought to put a specific question where I ask to prove or disprove if in this case $X$ is complete. So could someone help me, please?
Source: https://solveforum.com/forums/threads/solved-mysql-innodb-crash-recovery-file-ibdata1-open-returned-os-error-71-cannot-continue-operation.54713/
0 Response to "Innodb File iblogfile101 aio Write Returned Os Error 187 Cannot Continue Operation"
Post a Comment